🧐 BUYBACKS ON SOLANA: WHO’S REALLY REDUCING SUPPLY?
$DBR $MNDE $JUP $JTO $BONK $MPLX $RAY $PUMP $STREAM $ME $STEP
From Jupiter to Pumpfun, many projects announce “token buybacks” to redistribute value to holders.
But not every project actually burns tokens or creates a real supply reduction effect.
Some just buy tokens and hold them in the DAO treasury, or redistribute them to stakers. Let’s take a closer look at the landscape, summarized by @FabianoSolana:
1. deBridge – $DBR
100% of revenue is used to buy back tokens.
So far, about 3% of total supply has been bought.
If the current pace continues, buybacks could equal nearly 20% of circulating supply in a year.
DAO will decide whether these tokens are burned or held in the treasury.
2. Marinade – $MNDE
50% of platform fees are allocated to buybacks.
Marinade generates around $170M in annual revenue, while MNDE’s FDV is roughly $140M (Fabiano might be off; CoinGecko lists FDV at $77M).
DAO will decide how to use the repurchased tokens in the future.
3. Jupiter – $JUP
50% of protocol fees go toward buying back JUP.
Bought tokens are sent to a “litterbox” (storage).
So far, @JupiterExchange has repurchased ~95M JUP, about 1.37% of total supply.
The community is discussing whether to burn or redistribute these tokens.
4. Jito – $JTO
1.5% of fees from the TipRouter system are used for periodic JTO buybacks, which are then burned.
At current prices, the estimated annual buyback is ~11M JTO, or 1.1% of total supply.
👉 One of the clearest examples of buyback + burn on Solana.
5. Bonk – $BONK
50% of fees from the LetsBONK platform are used to buy back and burn BONK.
The buyback + burn mechanism reduces actual supply.
6. Metaplex – $MPLX
50% of monthly revenue is used to buy back MPLX for the DAO.
In the last 30 days, Metaplex generated $1.56M in revenue and repurchased 3.5M MPLX (~0.3% of total supply).
Bought tokens are held under DAO management.
7. Raydium – $RAY
12% of trading fees are allocated to buybacks.
Total supply: 555M RAY, with only 1.9M new tokens issued annually.
This roughly equals 5% of circulating supply being repurchased each year.
8. Pumpfun – $PUMP
100% of revenue is used to buy back tokens.
Average revenue exceeds $1M per day.
In September alone, Pumpfun spent $55M on buybacks. If sustained, this could repurchase over 30% of circulating supply in a year.
👉 Currently the largest buyback operation on Solana.
9. Streamflow – $STREAM
39% of revenue is used for buybacks and staker rewards.
Example: July 2025, 39% of $247K (~$96K) went to buybacks and staking rewards.
This model leans more toward buyback + reward than burning.
10. Magic Eden – $ME
Recently started a buyback program.
111K ME tokens have been repurchased and distributed to stakers.
Similar to Streamflow: tokens are bought to reward users rather than burned.
11. Step Finance – $STEP
100% of ecosystem revenue (including Solanafloor, Remora Markets, etc.) is used for buybacks.
4.25 K
5
El contenido al que estás accediendo se ofrece por terceros. A menos que se indique lo contrario, OKX no es autor de la información y no reclama ningún derecho de autor sobre los materiales. El contenido solo se proporciona con fines informativos y no representa las opiniones de OKX. No pretende ser un respaldo de ningún tipo y no debe ser considerado como un consejo de inversión o una solicitud para comprar o vender activos digitales. En la medida en que la IA generativa se utiliza para proporcionar resúmenes u otra información, dicho contenido generado por IA puede ser inexacto o incoherente. Lee el artículo enlazado para más detalles e información. OKX no es responsable del contenido alojado en sitios de terceros. Los holdings de activos digitales, incluidos stablecoins y NFT, suponen un alto nivel de riesgo y pueden fluctuar mucho. Debes considerar cuidadosamente si el trading o holding de activos digitales es adecuado para ti según tu situación financiera.

