the chain abstraction thesis has seen validation in that the *quantity* of chains has continued to rise without much end in sight
but as zon correctly identifies, most of these chains don't actually produce anything of value, leaving users split between the same few apps on the same few chains
as interop and chain abstraction proliferates, alongside the drive for actual value creation in this space, the appchain thesis will prove itself
it's a bit of a chicken-and-egg problem: you need adoption of chain abstraction to make appchains viable, but you need appchains to be used to get the full value out of chain abstraction, but I believe both of these things will grow in parallel
will take a few years and some mindset shifts in the industry but it will happen, 100%.
with so many chains having launched in the past 6 months and with many still yet to launch, it seems clear that we'll have infinite chains.
every one of these chains will use their token to incentive YOU (the builder) to generate value for THEM (the chain)
but as chains -> infinity, chain tokens tend to die faster.
it gets increasingly harder to believe the next sparkly chain with the same morpho, aave, pendle deployment is going to be the one that sticks.
certain chains with very unique value props (exchange related, not designed to be a gen purp chain, lindy, etc.) will be able to stand above the crowd but it'll only get tougher
instead, YOU (the builder) should opt to generate value for YOU instead
the best way to do that is by owning your stack and building an appchain while enabling users to deposit from trending pockets of liquidity
412
0
本页面内容由第三方提供。除非另有说明，欧易不是所引用文章的作者，也不对此类材料主张任何版权。该内容仅供参考，并不代表欧易观点，不作为任何形式的认可，也不应被视为投资建议或购买或出售数字资产的招揽。在使用生成式人工智能提供摘要或其他信息的情况下，此类人工智能生成的内容可能不准确或不一致。请阅读链接文章，了解更多详情和信息。欧易不对第三方网站上的内容负责。包含稳定币、NFTs 等在内的数字资产涉及较高程度的风险，其价值可能会产生较大波动。请根据自身财务状况，仔细考虑交易或持有数字资产是否适合您。