I'm on record saying I think all L1 and L2 tokens are extremely overvalued, & capture little to no value from the growth of their ecosystems.  Which is why none of these L1 tokens go higher despite an onslaught of new partnerships & new app growth announcements over the last 12 months.  Polymarket's massive growth while the POL token goes straight to $0 is a good example of this problem.  Same with Stablecoin growth doing nothing for underlying L1 growth.
BUT
Matt's argument below is the bull case for L1s. As is always the case when someone makes a bull argument for L1s, he does nothing to address why L1s are valuable, or what they're actually worth, but if you dream big enough regarding how important blockchains will be to the future of finance, you should in theory make money being long the ones that are used the most.
3.64萬
67
本頁面內容由第三方提供。除非另有說明,OKX 不是所引用文章的作者,也不對此類材料主張任何版權。該內容僅供參考,並不代表 OKX 觀點,不作為任何形式的認可,也不應被視為投資建議或購買或出售數字資產的招攬。在使用生成式人工智能提供摘要或其他信息的情況下,此類人工智能生成的內容可能不準確或不一致。請閱讀鏈接文章,瞭解更多詳情和信息。OKX 不對第三方網站上的內容負責。包含穩定幣、NFTs 等在內的數字資產涉及較高程度的風險,其價值可能會產生較大波動。請根據自身財務狀況,仔細考慮交易或持有數字資產是否適合您。


